Re: Afghanistan finally moves into the Lose column
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:39 pm
That sounds less flippant and more like basic acknowledgement of how fraught the evacuation situation truly is. Perhaps I'm reading it wrong.
That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
https://octopusoverlords.com/forum/
That sounds less flippant and more like basic acknowledgement of how fraught the evacuation situation truly is. Perhaps I'm reading it wrong.
"How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?” keeps rattling around my head. I imagine it's on Biden's mind, too.Little Raven wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:31 pm One of my coworkers is a very solid Democrat. Not a progressive, but a socially liberal fiscally conservative college educated professional - a Biden man from the start, who has been very pleased with everything he’s done up until now.
He just told me “If Biden abandons Americans in Afghanistan…That would be fucked up, even for me. I don’t know if I could forgive him for that.”
This situation is tremendously fraught for Biden. I hope he’s up to the task.
Yeah....I was referring more to his earlier comments in July.$iljanus wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:29 pmIn all fairness he did say this in his Aug 20th remarks even though I thought he was over promising a bit considering the security situation.stimpy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:06 pmThen Biden should have been more measured and cautious in his remarks.
Not that long ago he made it seem like this was going to be a very low risk evacuation and insisted no one would be left behind.
Anyone who wanted out would get out.
He seemed very nonchalant up until the point that things went to shit and then he became defensive and started finger pointing.
But make no mistake: This evacuation mission is dangerous. It involves risks to our armed forces, and it is being conducted under difficult circumstances.
I cannot promise what the final outcome will be or what it will be — that it will be without risk of loss. But as Commander-in-Chief, I can assure you that I will mobilize every resource necessary.
+1stimpy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:45 pmYeah....I was referring more to his earlier comments in July.$iljanus wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:29 pmIn all fairness he did say this in his Aug 20th remarks even though I thought he was over promising a bit considering the security situation.stimpy wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 3:06 pmThen Biden should have been more measured and cautious in his remarks.
Not that long ago he made it seem like this was going to be a very low risk evacuation and insisted no one would be left behind.
Anyone who wanted out would get out.
He seemed very nonchalant up until the point that things went to shit and then he became defensive and started finger pointing.
But make no mistake: This evacuation mission is dangerous. It involves risks to our armed forces, and it is being conducted under difficult circumstances.
I cannot promise what the final outcome will be or what it will be — that it will be without risk of loss. But as Commander-in-Chief, I can assure you that I will mobilize every resource necessary.
He set unattainable goals from the onset. And he did walk them back after the fact.
If he had been more upfront and honest about the possible dangers involved from the get go, I think people would have been a bit more prepared for the eventual shit show that was sure to come.
I love this quote from the guy whose Twitter is 99% filled with comments and rants about Trump:
@MAJMikeLyons wrote:Are we even trying? Did we hand deliver this or just send an email from some DC work from home employee? Is the person who sent this on the list? The humiliation will continue until this kind of stuff stops.
@Politico wrote:The Taliban has a history of brutally murdering Afghans who helped the U.S. and other coalition forces during the conflict.
The decision to give them specific names of Americans and Afghan allies to evacuate has angered lawmakers and military officials.
politico.com/news/2021/08/26…
U.S. Officials provided Taliban with names of Americans, Afghan allies to evacuate
"Basically, they just put all those Afghans on a kill list," said one defense official
There comes a time when you have an objective which will require risking the lives of soldiers.
And what form the evacuation will take from this point on…
But surely, the terrorists left in charge of counter-terrorism efforts in Afghanistan will now opt to prevent more terrorism from occurring…@PeterAlexander wrote:NEW: President Biden's national security team warned him today that "another terror attack in Kabul is likely, but that they are taking maximum force protection measures at the Kabul Airport," per a WH official.
Sure, if they were stationed in Baghram with a secure, triple-fenced perimeter. But we're now relying upon the Taliban "as a tool to protect us as much as possible," as CENTCOM Commander McKenzie put it just a few days ago. That's how you know it's a shitstorm waiting to happen.
So, with 5,000 to 7,000 of the most hardened fighters and al Qaeda operatives released from the prison in Baghram, there's a reasonable likelihood they were involved with the Kabul suicide bombing.axios.com wrote:The Taliban captured Bagram Air Base on Sunday and released thousands of prisoners, including many senior al Qaeda operatives.
Why it matters: The prisoners were some of the Taliban's most hardened fighters and could pose a threat not only to Afghan citizens but to American security interests.
State of play: U.S. forces handed control of the airfield to Afghan government forces in early July.
- Estimates suggest that from 5,000 to 7,000 prisoners were left behind following the U.S. withdrawal, per CNN.
I think there will be no shortage of replacements unfortunately.The U.S. military announced its first reprisal strike in Afghanistan since an attack on the Kabul airport killed as many as 170 people, in addition to 13 U.S. service members, as the U.S. officials again warned Americans to leave the airport because of security threats.
“U.S. military forces conducted an over-the-horizon counterterrorism operation today against an ISIS-K planner,” Capt. Bill Urban, spokesman for the U.S. Central Command, said in a statement, referring to the Islamic State affiliate in Afghanistan, also known as Islamic State Khorasan, which has claimed responsibility for the Thursday attack.
“The unmanned airstrike occurred in the Nangahar province of Afghanistan,” Captain Urban said. “Initial indications are that we killed the target. We know of no civilian casualties.”
BTW, the following video further illustrates the situation U.S. marines were saddled with, precisely where the attacks occurred:
@JaneFerguson5 wrote:This is what the #USMarines were facing in their day-to-day work at the exact spot where the attacks took place (filmed a few days ago). No one had been searched - it wasn’t possible. Tough conditions and incredibly vulnerable - open to attack. #KabulAiport #afghanistan
Anonymous Bosch wrote: ↑Fri Aug 27, 2021 4:32 pmSure, if they were stationed in Baghram with a secure, triple-fenced perimeter. But we're now relying upon the Taliban "as a tool to protect us as much as possible," as CENTCOM Commander McKenzie put it just a few days ago. That's how you know it's a shitstorm waiting to happen.
BTW, speaking of Baghram, the following Axios piece, dated August 15, provides some interesting perspective…
Thousands of prisoners freed by Taliban could pose threat to U.S.
So, with 5,000 to 7,000 of the most hardened fighters and al Qaeda operatives released from the prison in Baghram, there's a reasonable likelihood they were involved with the Kabul suicide bombing.axios.com wrote:The Taliban captured Bagram Air Base on Sunday and released thousands of prisoners, including many senior al Qaeda operatives.
Why it matters: The prisoners were some of the Taliban's most hardened fighters and could pose a threat not only to Afghan citizens but to American security interests.
State of play: U.S. forces handed control of the airfield to Afghan government forces in early July.
- Estimates suggest that from 5,000 to 7,000 prisoners were left behind following the U.S. withdrawal, per CNN.
The botched evacuation is entirely on the current POTUS; as he himself said, the buck stops with him. And past mistakes regarding Afghanistan do not absolve the president of his administration’s astonishing incompetence. Keep in mind, Biden was also a proponent of both the war and nation-building efforts in Afghanistan. It’s not as if he had no hand in creating the situation he has bungled in deadly fashion. By needlessly abandoning Baghram in June, by hamstringing the U.S. military and locking them in an airport, by failing to account for Americans and partners in-country before evacuating secure positions, by relying on the Taliban’s cooperation and allowing the group to dictate terms and timelines of withdrawal and security, the current administration has created a humanitarian crisis. Period and amen.
I never said a thing about absolving Biden. I simply said this was a mistake by more than one administration. Amen and apostrophe.Anonymous Bosch wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 7:33 pmThe botched evacuation is entirely on the current POTUS; as he himself said, the buck stops with him. And past mistakes regarding Afghanistan do not absolve the president of his administration’s astonishing incompetence. Keep in mind, Biden was also a proponent of both the war and nation-building efforts in Afghanistan. It’s not as if he had no hand in creating the situation he has bungled in deadly fashion. By needlessly abandoning Baghram in June, by hamstringing the U.S. military and locking them in an airport, by failing to account for Americans and partners in-country before evacuating secure positions, by relying on the Taliban’s cooperation and allowing the group to dictate terms and timelines of withdrawal and security, the current administration has created a humanitarian crisis. Period and amen.
Yes, and I am specifically saying the botched evacuation was not a mistake by more than one administration for the reasons previously indicated.hepcat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 7:48 pmI simply said this was a mistake by more than one administration. Amen and apostrophe.Anonymous Bosch wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 7:33 pmThe botched evacuation is entirely on the current POTUS; as he himself said, the buck stops with him. And past mistakes regarding Afghanistan do not absolve the president of his administration’s astonishing incompetence. Keep in mind, Biden was also a proponent of both the war and nation-building efforts in Afghanistan. It’s not as if he had no hand in creating the situation he has bungled in deadly fashion. By needlessly abandoning Baghram in June, by hamstringing the U.S. military and locking them in an airport, by failing to account for Americans and partners in-country before evacuating secure positions, by relying on the Taliban’s cooperation and allowing the group to dictate terms and timelines of withdrawal and security, the current administration has created a humanitarian crisis. Period and amen.
I believe he meant it, tbh... not that he was willing to fall on any sword.Anonymous Bosch wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 7:33 pm The botched evacuation is entirely on the current POTUS; as he himself said, the buck stops with him.
And as AP News reported about the Doha agreement:hepcat wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 9:07 pm He earns an F for this, yes. But overlooking the part the Doha Agreement debacle played in the current situation does not make it go away.
When the Taliban violated the Doha agreement -- premised on a negotiated power sharing -- the U.S. was free to keep Baghram, its 2,500 troops and NATO’s 5,000, to use air power. Biden could have saved thousands. He chose not to.apnews.com wrote:WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump’s administration signed a peace deal with the Taliban in February 2020, he optimistically proclaimed that “we think we’ll be successful in the end.” His secretary of state, Mike Pompeo, asserted that the administration was “seizing the best opportunity for peace in a generation.”
Eighteen months later, President Joe Biden is pointing to the agreement signed in Doha, Qatar, as he tries to deflect blame for the Taliban overrunning Afghanistan in a blitz. He says it bound him to withdraw U.S. troops, setting the stage for the chaos engulfing the country.
But Biden can go only so far in claiming the agreement boxed him in. It had an escape clause: The U.S. could have withdrawn from the accord if Afghan peace talks failed. They did, but Biden chose to stay in it, although he delayed the complete pullout from May to September.
And kept us stuck in Afghanistan indefinitely. After 20 years it's time to get out. The exit was always going to be messy but that's not a reason to keep troops there after 20 years.Anonymous Bosch wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 9:37 pm When the Taliban violated the Doha agreement -- premised on a negotiated power sharing -- the U.S. was free to keep Baghram, its 2,500 troops and NATO’s 5,000, to use air power. Biden could have saved thousands. He chose not to.
Only if you buy into an absurd prison of two ideas, i.e. that there were only two possibilities: reliance upon the Taliban "as a tool to protect us as much as possible" to withdraw via HKIA or remain indefinitely in Afghanistan.Exodor wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 11:48 pmAnd kept us stuck in Afghanistan indefinitely.Anonymous Bosch wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 9:37 pm When the Taliban violated the Doha agreement -- premised on a negotiated power sharing -- the U.S. was free to keep Baghram, its 2,500 troops and NATO’s 5,000, to use air power. Biden could have saved thousands. He chose not to.
I completely agree. But it's preposterous to pretend this was the only way evacuation was possible, and that Baghram could not possibly have provided a more secure evacuation hub.
That's no excuse; any military evacuation plan contingent upon planning for the best is a shitty one to say the least. The decision to abandon Baghram Air Base only served to hasten the collapse of Afghanistan by leaving them with no U.S. military support, and leaving the civilians stranded there with only one option: to try to get to the Kabul international airport through Taliban checkpoints (inducing the horrific videos of Afghan residents plunging to their deaths as they desperately clung to departing U.S. aircraft, along with the subsequent bombing).Victoria Raverna wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 12:54 am I think the plan was probably to withdraw before Taliban reached Kabul, not to rely on Taliban to protect. They probably think the Taliban will wait until after the withdrawal before taking over Afghanistan.
@AP wrote:BREAKING: Taliban spokesman says a U.S. airstrike targeted a suicide bomber in a vehicle who wanted to strike the Kabul airport. apne.ws/MJ9NIad
Nine members of one family were killed in a US drone strike targeting a vehicle in a residential neighborhood of Kabul, according to a relative of those killed.
Those killed included six children, the youngest being a 2-year-old girl, the brother of one of the dead told a local journalist working with CNN.
He said the people killed were his brother Zamaray (40 years old), Naseer (30), Zameer (20), Faisal (10), Farzad (9), Armin (4), Benyamin (3), Ayat (2) and Sumaya (2).
The brother cried as he told the journalist that they were "an ordinary family."
"We are not ISIS or Daesh and this was a family home — where my brothers lived with their families," he said.
CNN obtained images of the aftermath of the strike. A US official confirmed the location in Kabul's Khaje Bughra neighborhood. US Central Command said earlier they were assessing the possibilities of civilian casualties.
A man named Ahad, who said he was a neighbor of the family, told CNN: "All the neighbors tried to help and brought water to put out the fire and I saw that there were 5 or 6 people dead. The father of the family and another young boy and there were two children. They were dead. They were in pieces. There were [also] two wounded."
Ahad told CNN he had witnessed the airstrike at around 5 pm local time as he walked towards his home. He said he heard the noise of the rocket and a loud bang, and ducked for cover, before trying to help rescue his neighbors. Ahad told CNN that two other people were wounded in the attack.
The US military said in their statement that there were “Significant secondary explosions from the vehicle indicated the presence of a substantial amount of explosive material,” the spokesperson said.
A local journalist who visited the scene soon after the airstrike told CNN that "whatever material was in the car, I don’t know. The car was in a very bad state, just a skeleton of the car was left."
Indeed, the vast majority of U.S.-allied Afghanis are now in hiding or, if they're fortunate, evacuated out of the country. So realistically, you do have to wonder how reliable U.S. human intel in Afghanistan could possibly be at this stage.malchior wrote: ↑Sun Aug 29, 2021 7:48 pm We say ISIS-K bomber planning imminent attack - they say 9 people in one family including 6 children.
But… "New! Moderate!"nytimes.com wrote:Taliban leaders have promised amnesty to Afghan officials and soldiers, but there are increasing reports of detentions, disappearances and even executions.
ISTANBUL — When Taliban troops seized control of the Afghan capital two weeks ago, the invading units made a beeline for two critical targets: the headquarters of the National Security Directorate and the Ministry of Communications.
Their aim — recounted by two Afghan officials who had been briefed separately on the raid — was to secure the files of Afghan intelligence officers and their informers, and to obtain the means of tracking the telephone numbers of Afghan citizens.