That is not dead which can eternal lie, and with strange aeons bring us some web forums whereupon we can gather
https://octopusoverlords.com/forum/
It went great for the pair of cursed Lycans. 3 villagers dead and none the wiser. I'd say there's a pair of lycans happily plotting away another night of fun.Crux wrote:Well that could have gone better
Until they go hungry. The villagers are killing their prey as fast as they are.Roguetad wrote:It went great for the pair of cursed Lycans. 3 villagers dead and none the wiser. I'd say there's a pair of lycans happily plotting away another night of fun.Crux wrote:Well that could have gone better
Lycans? This calls for Kate Beckinsale in latex!Roguetad wrote:It went great for the pair of cursed Lycans. 3 villagers dead and none the wiser. I'd say there's a pair of lycans happily plotting away another night of fun.Crux wrote:Well that could have gone better
For the record, what exactly doesn't call for Kate Beckinsale in latex?Kelric wrote:This calls for Kate Beckinsale in latex!
Hmm.... good point. Though I suppose the sex could be slightly awkward with a full body suit like that. So maybe then she could just have on a latex skirt with some boots or something... but that'd still be her in latex. It's really a win-win situation I guess.Asharak wrote:For the record, what exactly doesn't call for Kate Beckinsale in latex?Kelric wrote:This calls for Kate Beckinsale in latex!
How very wrong you are. You're not even FROM this village. How do we know that you aren't working with the man-beasts?Zaxxon wrote:Setaside is definitely not a villager.
I had the same thought.Zaxxon wrote:Setaside is definitely not a villager.
setaside, whom was ralph-wiggums most stout defender? I was! Why then do you call for my ow death when clearly I worked to protect a villager? I call upon thee to change thy vote, lest I view your accusation with suspicion and return the favor!setaside wrote:Jeezus! Ralph was a dear friend. He fought long and hard to prove his innocence and it was all for naught. What injustice is this?! Unfortunately not near the injustice that I have wrought upon tbg and his family.
CGMark
smutly
setaside
Crux
gbasden
Yankeeman84
Suitably Ironic Moniker
Crux's smug attitude about losing our dear friend Ralph strikes me wrong. You would smile and stick out your tongue as the rest of us scoop up the remains of Ralph to deliver to his family?! Shame on you. In fact, his taunting nature through this whole ordeal so far stinks to me.
I want nothing more to do with Crux. The man is guilty I say!!!
Either you are VERY good at the ruse you are performing or you are innocent. If you are innocent, then I may change my vote and you will have my apologies. But the evidence will have to be compelling.Crux wrote:setaside, whom was ralph-wiggums most stout defender? I was! Why then do you call for my ow death when clearly I worked to protect a villager? I call upon thee to change thy vote, lest I view your accusation with suspicion and return the favor!
What more evidence can I provide? When RW was accused I fought hard to have him cleared. If I'm a werewolf, what do I gain from doing so? Remember the werewolves want us to lynch innocent people. I know I'm innocent, so the only question remaining is why you want to see me dead.setaside wrote:Either you are VERY good at the ruse you are performing or you are innocent. If you are innocent, then I may change my vote and you will have my apologies. But the evidence will have to be compelling.Crux wrote:setaside, whom was ralph-wiggums most stout defender? I was! Why then do you call for my ow death when clearly I worked to protect a villager? I call upon thee to change thy vote, lest I view your accusation with suspicion and return the favor!
Well, your tag does say "Pick me, Pick me!"Crux wrote:setaside, whom was ralph-wiggums most stout defender? I was! Why then do you call for my ow death when clearly I worked to protect a villager? I call upon thee to change thy vote, lest I view your accusation with suspicion and return the favor!setaside wrote:Jeezus! Ralph was a dear friend. He fought long and hard to prove his innocence and it was all for naught. What injustice is this?! Unfortunately not near the injustice that I have wrought upon tbg and his family.
CGMark
smutly
setaside
Crux
gbasden
Yankeeman84
Suitably Ironic Moniker
Crux's smug attitude about losing our dear friend Ralph strikes me wrong. You would smile and stick out your tongue as the rest of us scoop up the remains of Ralph to deliver to his family?! Shame on you. In fact, his taunting nature through this whole ordeal so far stinks to me.
I want nothing more to do with Crux. The man is guilty I say!!!
I'd think the answer to that would be obvious if you are in fact one of the werewolves.Crux wrote:I know I'm innocent, so the only question remaining is why you want to see me dead.
But you have no way of knowing I am one. So why the accusation? I'm pretty sure you're not the Seer. And if you're not the seer, then there's only one way you can know who is and who isn't a werewolf. By being a werewolf. And you sure seem to want me dead despite evidence to the fact I am in fact innocent. Don't make me vote for you to die (and do note I've held off a reciprocal death-vote for now).setaside wrote:I'd think the answer to that would be obvious if you are in fact one of the werewolves.Crux wrote:I know I'm innocent, so the only question remaining is why you want to see me dead.
Cesare's Divine Spark wrote:Spoiler:
Ralph may have known something that you did not want us to know. Thus you lobby to keep him around since the both of you have become very close. I think you and Ralph were planning something together that you both did not want us to find out about.Crux wrote:What more evidence can I provide? When RW was accused I fought hard to have him cleared. If I'm a werewolf, what do I gain from doing so? Remember the werewolves want us to lynch innocent people. I know I'm innocent, so the only question remaining is why you want to see me dead.setaside wrote:Either you are VERY good at the ruse you are performing or you are innocent. If you are innocent, then I may change my vote and you will have my apologies. But the evidence will have to be compelling.Crux wrote:setaside, whom was ralph-wiggums most stout defender? I was! Why then do you call for my ow death when clearly I worked to protect a villager? I call upon thee to change thy vote, lest I view your accusation with suspicion and return the favor!
Hey, big bossman won't let me stay home just because setaside might be devouring our friends behind our backs. But, I have to say, if I were the wolf (and I swear on CC's condom-laden horse stall that I'm not), I would remain silent as possible and let the crowd tear each other apart. To me, that leaves 2 individuals: Smutly and Yankeeman 84. Having met a number of Yankee fans, I am well aware of their problems with hygiene and extraneous body hair, so I vote for YM84!!setaside wrote:Of course I am disturbed by the lack of conversation from everybody else on this one.
And where were YOU last night while TGB hangs without life from the end of a rope?setaside wrote:Either you are VERY good at the ruse you are performing or you are innocent. If you are innocent, then I may change my vote and you will have my apologies. But the evidence will have to be compelling.Crux wrote:setaside, whom was ralph-wiggums most stout defender? I was! Why then do you call for my ow death when clearly I worked to protect a villager? I call upon thee to change thy vote, lest I view your accusation with suspicion and return the favor!
HAH!Suitably Ironic Moniker wrote:Hey, big bossman won't let me stay home just because setaside might be devouring our friends behind our backs. But, I have to say, if I were the wolf (and I swear on CC's condom-laden horse stall that I'm not), I would remain silent as possible and let the crowd tear each other apart. To me, that leaves 2 individuals: Smutly and Yankeeman 84. Having met a number of Yankee fans, I am well aware of their problems with hygiene and extraneous body hair, so I vote for YM84!!setaside wrote:Of course I am disturbed by the lack of conversation from everybody else on this one.
As I said above, I heard a gentile, swift scream and then silence. I then reached for my candle and looked outside and saw a man with red and white shoes. Death, I say, was walking with him. I could not get a good look on the mans face but I do know that it was a MAN.CGMark wrote:hmmm, it seems many people have taken que from RW, and are being very careful now about what they say. I feel bad that i did vote for RW in the beginning, but decided to even the vote out.
Hmmmm. Why would Yankeeman be out at night anyways? Watching people? I would think he would be home with his loved ones, trying to protect them from the werewolf.
Hmmmm.....
Since I'm dead and not supposed to talk, I'm going to put what I say in a spoiler tag. People that are in the game, don't read what I'm saying (not that it will affect anything):Asharak wrote:- AshSpoiler:
I'm not accusing anyone, yet. We obviously chose wrongly last time. The comment was exactly what it seemed - a lighthearted jab at the incongruency of his tag. You are being awefully defensive. I wonder why that might be?setaside wrote:Of course I am disturbed by the lack of conversation from everybody else on this one. Except gbasden who seems to be implicating you as well without actually accusing you. So what is it, gbasden? Either you suspect him or you don't. Don't just sit back and smile.
And I know for a fact that I am innocent. Just ask Sophia who kept my bed warm with me last night. Just don't tell her father. I'd rather not deal with that baggage at the moment.
I am removing my pick for the moment. gbasden's comment has piqued my curiosity.
I was sleeping the entire night until I heard the scream.setaside wrote:Yankeeman surely has a foul stench about him. Committing to little and explaining less. Why shouldn't I call you out? Where were you last night? What is that unwashed stain you have on your shirt there? Is that Blood? You and your state of constant perplexion has me perplexed. I don't trust you.
Anti-semite.Yankeeman84 wrote:
As I said above, I heard a gentile, swift scream
I say, how well could YM actually know R-W if he said that he heard the scream of a gentile, when all of us who truly called R-W our friend knew him to be Jewish (and American nonetheless)!!! J'accuse!!Yankeeman84 wrote:
HAH!
How dare you accuse me of killing my dear Ralph. Ralph and I raise tobacco together and I can say, with confidence, that I was sleeping the entire night while I heard a gentile, swift scream and then silence.
I grew tobacco with Ralph. He was my true friend.Suitably Ironic Moniker wrote:I say, how well could YM actually know R-W if he said that he heard the scream of a gentile, when all of us who truly called R-W our friend knew him to be Jewish (and American nonetheless)!!! J'accuse!!Yankeeman84 wrote:
HAH!
How dare you accuse me of killing my dear Ralph. Ralph and I raise tobacco together and I can say, with confidence, that I was sleeping the entire night while I heard a gentile, swift scream and then silence.
ETA: Down low, too slow.
How can SIM accuse anyone when he was walking through the FOREST last night?Crux wrote:SiM casts a convincing accusation. Methinks I, too shall vote for Yankeeman84. Kill him!
Methinks though dost protest too much!Yankeeman84 wrote:How can SIM accuse anyone when he was walking through the FOREST last night?Crux wrote:SiM casts a convincing accusation. Methinks I, too shall vote for Yankeeman84. Kill him!
I think SIM knows more than he is willing to admit.
