House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy spent the first two days of the new year trying to shore up GOP support for his bid to be Speaker by releasing a series of proposals aimed at winning over hard-right detractors who stand to torpedo his ascension.
The part of his proposed changes to House rules that drew the most attention was allowing just five House members to call for a vote at any time on ousting the Speaker; that would render McCarthy beholden to the most extreme members of his caucus, should he get on their wrong side. But buried in the text was another provision that could be highly consequential for the new Congress being sworn in on Tuesday: language that would effectively gut the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE), as the independent panel faces pressure to investigate lawmakers who participated in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.
2023 Republican House Follies
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus
-
- Posts: 24795
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm
2023 Republican House Follies
Republicans to start off the party right
-
- Posts: 24795
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
So today we'll find out if McCarthy has enough votes to be speaker - the CW is he *does not* and there will be a potentially lengthy series of votes to distill out how much chaos we will see. That is what is leading to the GOP adopting rules (as above). Some think he'll be Speaker but will make a lot of deals in the next few days which put MAGA in the driver's seat of the agenda.
Greg Sargent at WaPo had a good piece back in the summer about another rule and it turns out he got it right back then and it is buried in the new rules package as well. Here is a relevant snippet about what this means. In essence, the governance and rule of the House has been compromised by the extreme right.
The outcomes? Constant hostage taking and shooting of the hostage by extremists like Andy Biggs (R-Ariz wingnut who has vowed that McCarthy won't be speaker). This is why they hurried up and passed a budget at the end of December. They were worried about the chaos we were about to see and thought the first hostage to be shot would be default of the United States.
Greg Sargent at WaPo had a good piece back in the summer about another rule and it turns out he got it right back then and it is buried in the new rules package as well. Here is a relevant snippet about what this means. In essence, the governance and rule of the House has been compromised by the extreme right.
The outcomes? Constant hostage taking and shooting of the hostage by extremists like Andy Biggs (R-Ariz wingnut who has vowed that McCarthy won't be speaker). This is why they hurried up and passed a budget at the end of December. They were worried about the chaos we were about to see and thought the first hostage to be shot would be default of the United States.
Note that some House Republicans such as Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.) and Lauren Boebert (Colo.) have already called for defunding the FBI. Meanwhile, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy has telegraphed never-ending investigations into Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Justice Department, in retaliation for any activity that involves Trump.
Even an extreme GOP House would be very unlikely to totally disband the FBI, and an endless Benghazi-like circus would be harassing but not debilitating. But another threat takes the form of a parliamentary maneuver.
Beyer points out that a GOP House majority could reinstate the so-called Holman Rule. This obscure rule — which Republicans revived last time they held the majority, until the Democratic majority ended it — would allow Republicans to use spending bills to try to slash the salary of specific federal officials or eliminate blocks of federal employees, and thus specific programs.
In a little-noticed aside, Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) recently floated this idea, without detail. So it’s easy to see this rule being used as a mechanism to try to eliminate Garland’s salary, or the salaries of FBI officials overseeing an investigation involving Trump (or, if this happens, Justice Department officials prosecuting him).
Republicans could also attempt to defund any investigations into Trump, or even defund probes and prosecutions relating to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack. They could do this without the more improbable act of defunding the whole FBI.
Such an effort, of course, would not pass the Senate (if Democrats hold it) and would never get signed by President Biden. But it’s obvious Trump loyalists in the House will force showdowns over this, and if the GOP majority is narrow, those loyalists might be more empowered to succeed.
- pr0ner
- Posts: 17435
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia, VA
- Contact:
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
Sounds like it's going as well as everyone expected. It's almost like having a party full of nut-jobs is actually working against them for once.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Skinypupy
- Posts: 20438
- Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 10:12 am
- Location: Utah
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
I'm sure they'll fall in line eventually. It's what they do.
The shit-show in the meantime, however, certainly helps to highlight their complete dysfunction.
The shit-show in the meantime, however, certainly helps to highlight their complete dysfunction.
When darkness veils the world, four Warriors of Light shall come.
- Blackhawk
- Posts: 44247
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:48 pm
- Location: Southwest Indiana
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
The problem is that the people that it needs to be highlighted for aren't watching.
(˙pǝsɹǝʌǝɹ uǝǝq sɐɥ ʎʇıʌɐɹƃ ʃɐuosɹǝd ʎW)
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
Maybe? I can see them begrudgingly supporting McCarthy so they can get to the next phase, but then refusing to support or work with the majority of the GOP unless their terrorist demands are met (as noted above by malchior).
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Jaymann
- Posts: 19600
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:13 pm
- Location: California
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
"This is what happens when you don't recycle your pizza boxes."
Jaymann
]==(:::::::::::::>
Black Lives Matter
]==(:::::::::::::>
Black Lives Matter
- El Guapo
- Posts: 41441
- Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
- Location: Boston
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
TBH I'm kind of excited about the potential chaos, but at the the same time I know that the result is far more likely to be something crazy like speaker MTG than something sane or normal.
Black Lives Matter.
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
MTG fully supports McCarthy - he's going to get her back on committees so she can promote chaos internally.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
-
- Posts: 24795
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
This is where I started my thought journey on this. After some gaming it out I think that unless they do something that utterly breaks in obvious ways then the voters won't react. I think they took that away from the midterm. Measured crazy leads to them having more power. They want to walk a "medium crazy" path. That is why they're taking scalpels to rules and using more sophisticated twisting of the sausage making. They know it's a bit of a highwire act. Beyond the true revolutionaries causing chaos they're still plodding along and doing lasting, real damage.
The entertainment factor is somewhat what I am concerned about. People will glom on the outrage channels as the GOP intentionally channels chaos into click bait friendly media bites about how wacky they are. Meanwhile they'll continue to set up systems to consolidate power and cause more dysfunction.
- Kurth
- Posts: 5956
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
- Location: Portland
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
Is it strange that there’s 3 minutes and counting in this vote and 18 democrats have yet to cast a vote?
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
- Kurth
- Posts: 5956
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
- Location: Portland
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
Oh, is this just a quorum count? That makes more sense.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20123
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
Unless I’m reading it wrong, anyone left-leaning should not be cheering on this speaker chaos.
While maybe typically in-ranks division might delight opponents, in this case it’s lose-lose from what I can tell:
1. McCarthy gets the job…and we get McCarthy. But a very likely nastier version than we’ve known because he had to move RIGHT to get the job. Now he’s compromised, or at least biased by the right nuts.
2. McCarthy loses….and a more ‘pure’ MAGAT is waiting in the wings? More right than MCarthy? No thanks! So now I guess I’m hoping that McCarthy gets it.
3. ??
While maybe typically in-ranks division might delight opponents, in this case it’s lose-lose from what I can tell:
1. McCarthy gets the job…and we get McCarthy. But a very likely nastier version than we’ve known because he had to move RIGHT to get the job. Now he’s compromised, or at least biased by the right nuts.
2. McCarthy loses….and a more ‘pure’ MAGAT is waiting in the wings? More right than MCarthy? No thanks! So now I guess I’m hoping that McCarthy gets it.
3. ??
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
I think the solid bet is that McCarthy has to get it and he'll do whatever it takes to secure the votes from the fringe lunatics. This will likely undermine his future position, but I'm guessing he'd rather be named the Speaker and then fight whatever battle is next. In short, he'll capitulate to them to gain their support and hope he can wrangle them in the future. Spoiler: he can't.
I don't think anyone else in the GOP is going to get nominated. McCarthy is already a wingnut and trying to get someone even nuttier than he is to appeal to the fringe GOP members will then alienate the so-called "moderates" in the party.
The GOP has really put themselves into quite a position. I'm reminded of the Tea Party takeover, except this time the GOP fringe members are violent, anti-democratic conspiracy theory wackos.
I don't think anyone else in the GOP is going to get nominated. McCarthy is already a wingnut and trying to get someone even nuttier than he is to appeal to the fringe GOP members will then alienate the so-called "moderates" in the party.
The GOP has really put themselves into quite a position. I'm reminded of the Tea Party takeover, except this time the GOP fringe members are violent, anti-democratic conspiracy theory wackos.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
-
- Posts: 24795
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
I have to wonder if something "impossible" (read extra hard) is in the middle of the two sides. One guess here is impeaching Biden. The hardliners want a guarantee of a vote perhaps and the less crazy GOPers won't go with it at all (the medium crazy path I postulate is the road they want to take) and they are channeling that disagreement through McCarthy?
- Carpet_pissr
- Posts: 20123
- Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
- Location: Columbia, SC
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
I would be shocked if it’s something that relatively benign/expected. Delighted, but shocked.
- pr0ner
- Posts: 17435
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia, VA
- Contact:
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
I wonder if McCarthy is going to follow through on his "promise" to not give any R who votes against him a committee seat. Not sitting almost 20 Republicans (at the moment) would be a lot of R's not on committees.
Hodor.
- Octavious
- Posts: 20040
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
20 short? Woof if that's the case.
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
-
- Posts: 24795
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
I would expect he will only do it if the rules allow him to seat enough Republicans to control the committees or overwhelm the members who only have so much bandwidth that compete with fundraising requirements.
-
- Posts: 24795
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
One little editorial note. Fuck reporters who keep focusing on talking about how embarrassing this is for the Republicans. This is wrong. This is embarrassing for *all of us*. The United States is signaling political instability again. This is the type of stuff that in the past was in the orbit of the battling before and after the Civil War.
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
Have they started blaming Biden yet? That he's unable to unify the GOP House?malchior wrote: ↑Tue Jan 03, 2023 3:01 pm One little editorial note. Fuck reporters who keep focusing on talking about how embarrassing this is for the Republicans. This is wrong. This is embarrassing for *all of us*. The United States is signaling political instability again. This is the type of stuff that in the past was in the orbit of the battling before and after the Civil War.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Octavious
- Posts: 20040
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
So Jeffries has more votes? That's got to hurt. I'm only picking up what's going on from random screenshots.
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
-
- Posts: 24795
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm
- stessier
- Posts: 29872
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:30 pm
- Location: SC
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
I require a reminder as to why raining arcane destruction is not an appropriate response to all of life's indignities. - Vaarsuvius
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
- Isgrimnur
- Posts: 82491
- Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
- Location: Chookity pok
- Contact:
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
I guess "House Majority Leader-elect Steve Scalise" didn't quite get his support together.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
- Octavious
- Posts: 20040
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
So what happens if Jeffries wins?
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
- Defiant
- Posts: 21045
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Tongue in cheek
- stessier
- Posts: 29872
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:30 pm
- Location: SC
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
I require a reminder as to why raining arcane destruction is not an appropriate response to all of life's indignities. - Vaarsuvius
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
- Defiant
- Posts: 21045
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Tongue in cheek
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
He won't. You need a majority, not a plurality (unless they decide to temporarily change the rules, which they have in the past, but then, IIRC, it was because there were multiple parties in the House and no party had majority).
- Octavious
- Posts: 20040
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
Well I meant if some people went total nuts and said screw it I'm voting the other party. I mean I know it won't happen, but one can dream. We'll probably end up with Gym Jordan back here in reality.
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
- Smoove_B
- Posts: 54828
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
- Location: Kaer Morhen
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
The did remove all the metal detectors for the House - maybe they should put them back and see if that helps with the vote?
Maybe next year, maybe no go
- Defiant
- Posts: 21045
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Tongue in cheek
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
BTW, have all the Republicans voting against McCarthy been from the far-right end of the Republican party?
- stessier
- Posts: 29872
- Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 12:30 pm
- Location: SC
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
Actually, it could happen - but it would be super embarrassing.
So if it dropped enough where only 212 was needed and the Republicans split enough that the Dems got 212 and the highest Rep was at 211, the Dems would get it.Remember: McCarthy does not technically need 218 votes to become speaker. A majority of those present and voting is required to get the speakership, which is usually 218 lawmakers. But if enough people skip the vote or vote “present,” the number of votes required for a majority can drop. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was elected with 216 votes in 2021.
I require a reminder as to why raining arcane destruction is not an appropriate response to all of life's indignities. - Vaarsuvius
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Global Steam Wishmaslist Tracking
Running__ | __2014: 1300.55 miles__ | __2015: 2036.13 miles__ | __2016: 1012.75 miles__ | __2017: 1105.82 miles__ | __2018: 1318.91 miles | __2019: 2000.00 miles |
- Alefroth
- Posts: 8608
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Bellingham WA
- Holman
- Posts: 29093
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:00 pm
- Location: Between the Schuylkill and the Wissahickon
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
Jordan is a known backstabber, and I imagine that this was strategized in advance. His rising to nominate McCarthy on the 2nd ballot sets him up to look like a GOP conciliator when McCarthy proves incapable of a majority.All 19 Republicans who rejected McCarthy on 1st ballot reject him again on 2nd ballot.
1st ballot, they split.
2nd ballot, all 19 vote Jim Jordan.
Much prefer my Nazis Nuremberged.
- Jaymann
- Posts: 19600
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 7:13 pm
- Location: California
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
So 5 Dems could also call for weekly votes.
Jaymann
]==(:::::::::::::>
Black Lives Matter
]==(:::::::::::::>
Black Lives Matter
- Alefroth
- Posts: 8608
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Bellingham WA
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
If I understand it correctly. That's if the rule isn't changed to make it 1.
- pr0ner
- Posts: 17435
- Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
- Location: Northern Virginia, VA
- Contact:
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
I don't think the Republican rules packages go into effect with Jeffries as Speaker.
Hodor.
- Alefroth
- Posts: 8608
- Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 1:56 pm
- Location: Bellingham WA
Re: 2023 Republican House Follies
Five is what it is now, isn't it?
Last edited by Alefroth on Tue Jan 03, 2023 4:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.