The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

For discussion of religion and politics

Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus

Post Reply
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by El Guapo »

Octavious wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:35 pm Shocking nobody he's filed to have it blocked while his appeal is heard. Based on the previous judgements this shouldn't happen, but of course it will. Master of abusing the court systems.
I'm not sure that he's such a master of it. It's more that McConnell has stacked the appellate courts with conservative judges willing to help out on stuff like this.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Octavious
Posts: 20035
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Octavious »

El Guapo wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:48 pm
Octavious wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:35 pm Shocking nobody he's filed to have it blocked while his appeal is heard. Based on the previous judgements this shouldn't happen, but of course it will. Master of abusing the court systems.
I'm not sure that he's such a master of it. It's more that McConnell has stacked the appellate courts with conservative judges willing to help out on stuff like this.
This is crap he's been doing his entire life was my point. Even prior to being president he abused the living hell out of anything he could. I seriously have never hated anyone more than that piece of crap.
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.

Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

El Guapo wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:48 pm
Octavious wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:35 pm Shocking nobody he's filed to have it blocked while his appeal is heard. Based on the previous judgements this shouldn't happen, but of course it will. Master of abusing the court systems.
I'm not sure that he's such a master of it. It's more that McConnell has stacked the appellate courts with conservative judges willing to help out on stuff like this.
No. No. Very serious people keep saying this is the system working as expected. Anyway, in reality the wrinkle of course is that these are Democratic appointed judges. I suspect they are granting the injunction because they got it at the last minute and the egg will be already broken if they didn't grant it. Still I'll say it again, this system is unable to confront the very real legal attack under way in any sort of timely manner. We're fucked.
User avatar
Kurth
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
Location: Portland

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Kurth »

malchior wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:21 pm
El Guapo wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:48 pm
Octavious wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:35 pm Shocking nobody he's filed to have it blocked while his appeal is heard. Based on the previous judgements this shouldn't happen, but of course it will. Master of abusing the court systems.
I'm not sure that he's such a master of it. It's more that McConnell has stacked the appellate courts with conservative judges willing to help out on stuff like this.
No. No. Very serious people keep saying this is the system working as expected. Anyway, in reality the wrinkle of course is that these are Democratic appointed judges. I suspect they are granting the injunction because they got it at the last minute and the egg will be already broken if they didn't grant it. Still I'll say it again, this system is unable to confront the very real legal attack under way in any sort of timely manner. We're fucked.
It was an unopposed motion to stay along with a request for an expedited briefing schedule. These are going to granted close to 100% of the time by any appellate court, regardless if the panel is made up of Democratic or Republican appointed judges. All briefing will be completed in two weeks and a hearing is set for 11/30.

This one is not a big deal, honestly.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

Kurth wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 11:55 am

This one is not a big deal, honestly.
Right I get the mechanics. The big deal for me is the speed. Our democracy is under attack and the system is just grinding away slowly unable to adjust to the pace. 6 months to stand up a committee. Weeks to request documents. Lawsuits that are designed to slow everything down. Appeals that take weeks/months. All while the people opposing our democracy are running flat out. We're going to lose this race.
User avatar
Tao
Posts: 1537
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 3:47 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Tao »

malchior wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 2:04 pm
Kurth wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 11:55 am

This one is not a big deal, honestly.
Right I get the mechanics. The big deal for me is the speed. Our democracy is under attack and the system is just grinding away slowly unable to adjust to the pace. 6 months to stand up a committee. Weeks to request documents. Lawsuits that are designed to slow everything down. Appeals that take weeks/months. All while the people opposing our democracy are running flat out. We're going to lose this race.
I am in your corner on this, but you realize what your describing has been the nature of the beast for at least the past 75 years if not many more. This is the template that made the mold that created the cookie cutter for large bureaucracies. The irony for me is this is one of the top complaints "small government", "keep your Federal assess out of my business" conservatives complain about and the one of the first recourses they turn to when pressed.
"Don't touch my stuff when I'm dead...it's booytrapped!" - Bender Bending Rodriguez
User avatar
Zaxxon
Forum Moderator
Posts: 28118
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:11 am
Location: Surrounded by Mountains

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Zaxxon »

User avatar
pr0ner
Posts: 17424
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 3:00 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, VA
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by pr0ner »

Hodor.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

Nice! Hopefully that'll put pressure on Meadows et. al. The worry after I read the Lawfareblog piece above is that Bannon will take it to trial ... and might win.
User avatar
geezer
Posts: 7551
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 1:52 pm
Location: Yeeha!

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by geezer »

malchior wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 5:08 pm Nice! Hopefully that'll put pressure on Meadows et. al. The worry after I read the Lawfareblog piece above is that Bannon will take it to trial ... and might win.
...or lose and be immediately pardoned by whatever nightmare (R) wins the next presidential election after getting soundly trounced in the popular vote...
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

Distinctly possible as well. :(
User avatar
Kurth
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
Location: Portland

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Kurth »

malchior wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 5:08 pm Nice! Hopefully that'll put pressure on Meadows et. al. The worry after I read the Lawfareblog piece above is that Bannon will take it to trial ... and might win.
I am not understanding how you think Bannon could possibly win if he took this to trial. I read the Lawfareblog quote in the other thread. The fact that the DOJ has taken positions previously in favor of a robust executive privilege is, in my mind, leaps and bounds away from the situation at hand with Bannon. Trump is not president. The privilege is not personal, so he is in no position to assert it. And it clearly has no application here anyway since Bannon wasn't even an executive branch employee at the time in question. This is just so much BS.

Also, I felt like the Lawfareblog piece made it seem like a contempt charge requires a heightened level of intent. I could be wrong on this, but I was under the impression that the only intent required here was the intent to not comply with the subpoena. I didn't think that Bannon having a good faith, subjective belief that the subpoena was invalid has anything to do with the question. If that's not the case, please correct me.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

Kurth wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 6:15 pm
malchior wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 5:08 pm Nice! Hopefully that'll put pressure on Meadows et. al. The worry after I read the Lawfareblog piece above is that Bannon will take it to trial ... and might win.
I am not understanding how you think Bannon could possibly win if he took this to trial. I read the Lawfareblog quote in the other thread. The fact that the DOJ has taken positions previously in favor of a robust executive privilege is, in my mind, leaps and bounds away from the situation at hand with Bannon. Trump is not president. The privilege is not personal, so he is in no position to assert it. And it clearly has no application here anyway since Bannon wasn't even an executive branch employee at the time in question. This is just so much BS.
I totally agree it should be BS but they seem to be indicating there will be potentially complicated defenses and we have to hope a potential jury is able to decide them.
Also, I felt like the Lawfareblog piece made it seem like a contempt charge requires a heightened level of intent. I could be wrong on this, but I was under the impression that the only intent required here was the intent to not comply with the subpoena. I didn't think that Bannon having a good faith, subjective belief that the subpoena was invalid has anything to do with the question. If that's not the case, please correct me.
My read was that he could argue he believed he had good reason not to comply - even as obviously steeped in bullshit those arguments will be. The defect that work against him though there is that usually you have to appear to claim the privilege.

Anyway, where it comes to "imperial" Presidency stuff for me it comes down to it gets complicated and that doesn't make anything a slam dunk. Charging him is a good step and a win all its own IMO. An indictment is no small thing and might give some of these dumbasses at least a moment of pause before thumbing their noses at Congress.
User avatar
Kurth
Posts: 5882
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 1:19 am
Location: Portland

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Kurth »

malchior wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 6:37 pm
Kurth wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 6:15 pm
malchior wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 5:08 pm Nice! Hopefully that'll put pressure on Meadows et. al. The worry after I read the Lawfareblog piece above is that Bannon will take it to trial ... and might win.
I am not understanding how you think Bannon could possibly win if he took this to trial. I read the Lawfareblog quote in the other thread. The fact that the DOJ has taken positions previously in favor of a robust executive privilege is, in my mind, leaps and bounds away from the situation at hand with Bannon. Trump is not president. The privilege is not personal, so he is in no position to assert it. And it clearly has no application here anyway since Bannon wasn't even an executive branch employee at the time in question. This is just so much BS.
I totally agree it should be BS but they seem to be indicating there will be potentially complicated defenses and we have to hope a potential jury is able to decide them.
Also, I felt like the Lawfareblog piece made it seem like a contempt charge requires a heightened level of intent. I could be wrong on this, but I was under the impression that the only intent required here was the intent to not comply with the subpoena. I didn't think that Bannon having a good faith, subjective belief that the subpoena was invalid has anything to do with the question. If that's not the case, please correct me.
My read was that he could argue he believed he had good reason not to comply - even as obviously steeped in bullshit those arguments will be. The defect that work against him though there is that usually you have to appear to claim the privilege.

Anyway, where it comes to "imperial" Presidency stuff for me it comes down to it gets complicated and that doesn't make anything a slam dunk. Charging him is a good step and a win all its own IMO. An indictment is no small thing and might give some of these dumbasses at least a moment of pause before thumbing their noses at Congress.
I don’t see it that way. The only good outcomes here are he complies with the subpoena and appears or he sits his ass in jail.
Just 'cause you feel it, doesn't mean it's there -- Radiohead
Do you believe me? Do you trust me? Do you like me? 😳
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

Kurth wrote: Fri Nov 12, 2021 8:55 pmI don’t see it that way. The only good outcomes here are he complies with the subpoena and appears or he sits his ass in jail.
Indeed. I'm just trying to find some positives because I'm pretty sure the first is not happening and the second is a ways off at the moment.
Drazzil
Posts: 4723
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:54 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Drazzil »

Trump HAS to win in 24. Otherwise he's gonna be going to prison. Tax evasion I think. Delay until then.
Daehawk wrote:Thats Drazzil's chair damnit.
User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 19980
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Carpet_pissr »

malchior wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 6:21 pm
El Guapo wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:48 pm
Octavious wrote: Thu Nov 11, 2021 1:35 pm Shocking nobody he's filed to have it blocked while his appeal is heard. Based on the previous judgements this shouldn't happen, but of course it will. Master of abusing the court systems.
I'm not sure that he's such a master of it. It's more that McConnell has stacked the appellate courts with conservative judges willing to help out on stuff like this.
No. No. Very serious people keep saying this is the system working as expected. Anyway, in reality the wrinkle of course is that these are Democratic appointed judges. I suspect they are granting the injunction because they got it at the last minute and the egg will be already broken if they didn't grant it. Still I'll say it again, this system is unable to confront the very real legal attack under way in any sort of timely manner. We're fucked.
The system IS working as expected…from the Republican party and especially Federalist Society perspective.

But it’s not just accidental ‘well oiled machine running smoothly’. It took them years, decades even, to get to this point of judicial dominance.

The party embraced it as a plank, and everyone moved in lockstep. Everyone on the same page wrt the courts, nominations, priority, etc: Federalist Society, Presidents, ‘R party operatives’, members of Congress, and maybe most importantly voters. And it’s been VERY effective.

I think the wrinkle and irony (for them) is that by achieving their Machiavellian-sequel goal, they have in effect destroyed the ‘majesty of the court’ where it gets its power.

We definitely live in interesting times already, but the next few years are going to be…riveting.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54567
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Smoove_B »


This is really something. A political party is paying for a former president’s legal bills for an investigation into his private business practices >
The Republican Party agreed to pay some of Trump’s legal bills in the N.Y. investigation about his finances. The party has paid lawyer Ronald Fischetti about $120k so far.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82093
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Isgrimnur »

At least he's getting paid.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54567
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Smoove_B »

How many times is this?


Breaking Reuters: U.S. JUDGE DISMISSES CASE IN WHICH FORMER PRESIDENT TRUMP SOUGHT TO KEEP HIS TAX RETURNS FROM CONGRESS -COURT DOCUMENT
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54567
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Smoove_B »

Oh look, he's appealing the ruling:
A federal judge on Tuesday dealt a blow to former President Donald Trump's bid to keep his tax returns from Congress, ruling that the Treasury Department could disclose them to the House committee that requested them more than two years ago.

Overnight, Trump's attorneys told the court they would appeal.

The decision stems from the case initially brought by House Ways and Means Chairman Richard Neal against the Treasury Department under the Trump administration, when the department rebuffed his request for the returns under a law that allows disclosure of an individual's tax returns to the committee.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
User avatar
Octavious
Posts: 20035
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 2:50 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Octavious »

What is the point of you can just appeal forever?
Capitalism tries for a delicate balance: It attempts to work things out so that everyone gets just enough stuff to keep them from getting violent and trying to take other people’s stuff.

Shameless plug for my website: www.nettphoto.com
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

Octavious wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 12:35 pm What is the point of you can just appeal forever?
Behold the majesty of due process in the United States*

*Only applicable if you're rich or powerful
User avatar
LawBeefaroni
Forum Moderator
Posts: 55316
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 3:08 pm
Location: Urbs in Horto, outrageous taxes on everything

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by LawBeefaroni »

Octavious wrote: Wed Dec 15, 2021 12:35 pm What is the point of you can just appeal forever?
Attorneys gotta eat.
" Hey OP, listen to my advice alright." -Tha General
"No scientific discovery is named after its original discoverer." -Stigler's Law of Eponymy, discovered by Robert K. Merton

MYT
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

malchior wrote: Thu Jul 01, 2021 3:05 pm
El Guapo wrote: Thu Jul 01, 2021 11:30 amThat said, really my main concern here is that Vance is running the show on this. I'm not an expert on him, but my general sense is that he doesn't have a great reputation for either competence or integrity. Though the NYAG is involved as well, though I'm not sure how long they've been on it.
Vance is a literal institutionalist. He was raised in the machine, he breathes it, and he has winked and nodded often at elites (including Kushner and Ivanka) which is why I'm glad she is involved.
Surprising absolutely no one Vance spent 3.5 years in this and came up empty.

User avatar
Smoove_B
Posts: 54567
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 am
Location: Kaer Morhen

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Smoove_B »

And why should they? Nothing matters.
Former President Trump’s eldest son and daughter have refused to comply with subpoenas issued by the New York State attorney general’s office as it conducts a civil investigation into the way the family real estate business valued its holdings.

“A dispute has arisen between the OAG and the Individual Trump Parties regarding the Subpoenas,” a document filed Monday said.

The document, filed jointly by New York Attorney General Letitia James and an attorney for the Trump Organization, said Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump will now be named as respondents in James’ ongoing inquiry, which parallels a criminal investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office.
Maybe next year, maybe no go
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

Subpoenas are only for the little people who can't afford to delay them years.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by El Guapo »

I still remember how excited I was in 2019 for the Democrats to gain subpoena power. What a sweet summer child I was.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 19980
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Carpet_pissr »

El Guapo wrote: Mon Jan 03, 2022 3:54 pm I still remember how excited I was in 2019 for the Democrats to gain subpoena power. What a sweet summer child I was.
I guess you completely forgot about the MULTIPLE stern tweets, right? I believe a few letters threatening to consider strong action were written as well. DID YOU FORGET THE LETTERS?!
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

Good old Merrick Garland is going to step out and tell us they are totes taking this very seriously.

User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 19980
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Carpet_pissr »

Oh thank God. We're saved.
User avatar
Isgrimnur
Posts: 82093
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:29 am
Location: Chookity pok
Contact:

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Isgrimnur »

'Commitment to defend' is a future-oriented statement. 'Hold accountable' would be one directed at past actions.
It's almost as if people are the problem.
User avatar
Carpet_pissr
Posts: 19980
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:32 pm
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Carpet_pissr »

I have an unwavering committment to mercilessly mock comments like this from the weak Democrats that want to seem like they can or are willing to ACTUALLY do something.
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

Holding out hope here for some justice.

User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by El Guapo »

I've been skeptical that state or local authorities would be the ones to charge Trump. They'd have to withstand a metric shit ton of pressure, plus there are actually genuinely good reasons to worry about empowering local criminal authorities to charge current or former Presidents (imagine how many Arpaios and Abbots of the world would love pursuing insane theories against Obama / Clinton / etc.).

That said, Georgia is intruiging because Trump was specifically targeting Georgia's election system / results.

Of course, I would think that the Georgia state government would come down on Fulton County like a ton of bricks if they pursue this.
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Pyperkub
Posts: 23583
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 5:07 pm
Location: NC- that's Northern California

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Pyperkub »

El Guapo wrote:I've been skeptical that state or local authorities would be the ones to charge Trump. They'd have to withstand a metric shit ton of pressure, plus there are actually genuinely good reasons to worry about empowering local criminal authorities to charge current or former Presidents (imagine how many Arpaios and Abbots of the world would love pursuing insane theories against Obama / Clinton / etc.).

That said, Georgia is intruiging because Trump was specifically targeting Georgia's election system / results.

Of course, I would think that the Georgia state government would come down on Fulton County like a ton of bricks if they pursue this.
And is on tape doing just that. (but, this isn't the first time he's been caught on tape breaking the law).
Black Lives definitely Matter Lorini!

Also: There are three ways to not tell the truth: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63527
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Daehawk »

--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
malchior
Posts: 24794
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by malchior »

This is the civil case btw - it means big trouble for the Trump Organization potentially but the underlying crimes that got it that way? Who knows if they'll get there. That is actually part of why they are resisting subpoenas in this civil case claiming it'll be used against them in criminal proceedings.
User avatar
El Guapo
Posts: 41247
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:01 pm
Location: Boston

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by El Guapo »

malchior wrote: Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:55 am This is the civil case btw - it means big trouble for the Trump Organization potentially but the underlying crimes that got it that way? Who knows if they'll get there. That is actually part of why they are resisting subpoenas in this civil case claiming it'll be used against them in criminal proceedings.
And not to bring the law into it, BUT: (1) there's no fifth amendment (or other right) to not produce documents pursuant to subpoena even if those documents are incriminating, unless the subpoena is written in a really weird way (e.g., "please produce all documents that prove that you committed a crime"); (2) there's no fifth amendment right not to show up to testify pursuant to a subpoena (but you can show up and assert the right in response to any particular question).
Black Lives Matter.
User avatar
Daehawk
Posts: 63527
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 1:11 am

Re: The Trump Investigation(s) Thread

Post by Daehawk »

Hey they got Al Capone on tax evasion...never know. Im just surprised NO ONE investigated a millionaire who pays less tax than me.
--------------------------------------------
I am Dyslexic of Borg, prepare to have your ass laminated.
I guess Ray Butts has ate his last pancake.
http://steamcommunity.com/id/daehawk
"Has high IQ. Refuses to apply it"
Post Reply