I have an idea for future Presidential Debates
Moderators: LawBeefaroni, $iljanus
- RunningMn9
- Posts: 24466
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:55 pm
- Location: The Sword Coast
- Contact:
I have an idea for future Presidential Debates
I noticed a lot of people mentioning that supporters on both sides believed things that simply weren't true, and that they believed them because of what their campaigns told them.
So here's what I suggest. Next debate, instead of using stupid little lights to tell me how time is left in any particular non-answer, we use those lights for a real purpose.
Show the green light when the candidate is listing information that's true. Show the yellow light when the candidate is stretching the truth. And flash the red light when he's outright lying.
We can also flash "LIAR!" on the screen when a lie is detected.
Can I get any support for this?
So here's what I suggest. Next debate, instead of using stupid little lights to tell me how time is left in any particular non-answer, we use those lights for a real purpose.
Show the green light when the candidate is listing information that's true. Show the yellow light when the candidate is stretching the truth. And flash the red light when he's outright lying.
We can also flash "LIAR!" on the screen when a lie is detected.
Can I get any support for this?
And in banks across the world
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
Christians, Moslems, Hindus, Jews
And every other race, creed, colour, tint or hue
Get down on their knees and pray
The raccoon and the groundhog neatly
Make up bags of change
But the monkey in the corner
Well he's slowly drifting out of range
- LordMortis
- Posts: 70230
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:26 pm
- The Meal
- Posts: 27993
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:33 pm
- Location: 2005 Stanley Cup Champion
And set up a 900 number so the national audience can *VOTE* the presidential hopeful off the ballot (at a mere $.99 per vote). Our America needs to blend reality programming with our elective capabilities...
~Neal
~Neal
"Better to talk to people than communicate via tweet." — Elontra
- Kadoth Nodens
- Posts: 3271
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:53 am
- Location: Zod Center
Lets make it entertaining. Liars get spanked by hot chicks.
They get barehanded smacks for using stats that are technically true, but misleading, and paddled with a board for out-and-out lies.
If you manage to get through the debate without lying at all, you get to spank the hot chicks or your opponent.
They get barehanded smacks for using stats that are technically true, but misleading, and paddled with a board for out-and-out lies.
If you manage to get through the debate without lying at all, you get to spank the hot chicks or your opponent.
- Kadoth Nodens
- Posts: 3271
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:53 am
- Location: Zod Center
- Kraken
- Posts: 43802
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:59 pm
- Location: The Hub of the Universe
- Contact:
There is a shot in an old sf movie -- 2001 A Space Odyssey, IIRC -- in which a politician is giving a speech while captions on the screen correct his statistics and give labels like "Speculation" and "Untruth" in real time. Maybe in a few more years, speech recognition + AI + the internet will make it possible.
- Mr. Fed
- Posts: 15111
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:05 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Lights? Bah. Lights are for wimps. What you need is for the candidates to have electrodes attached to their genitals and hooked to a monitoring system and power souce. For each second that they proceed without directly answering the question before them, the juice would get turned up. Only the truly determined would be able to dissemble for long. And it should cut back on sex scandals.
- dangerballs
- Posts: 585
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 3:44 am
- Location: Ames, Iowa
Or you could just have color commentators that give play-by-play assessment of the debate.Ironrod wrote:There is a shot in an old sf movie -- 2001 A Space Odyssey, IIRC -- in which a politician is giving a speech while captions on the screen correct his statistics and give labels like "Speculation" and "Untruth" in real time. Maybe in a few more years, speech recognition + AI + the internet will make it possible.
- Trent Steel
- Posts: 8136
- Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 11:28 am
- Location: Pain Dome
- Defiant
- Posts: 21045
- Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 11:09 pm
- Location: Tongue in cheek
Even better, simmilar to one from a Doctor Who episode, is to set up every television with a voting system, and after each question is answered, the population gets to vote on who is zapped. Power to the people!Mr. Fed wrote:Lights? Bah. Lights are for wimps. What you need is for the candidates to have electrodes attached to their genitals and hooked to a monitoring system and power souce. For each second that they proceed without directly answering the question before them, the juice would get turned up. Only the truly determined would be able to dissemble for long. And it should cut back on sex scandals.