Moderators: Bakhtosh, EvilHomer3k
cheeba wrote:Of course while I feel good about my speed increasing, I also got a nice reality check on the run. I hear the pitter patter of feet behind me and I know someone's catching up to me. This chick runs by and we say hi, I tell her she's shaming me and she laughs and says at least I'm moving. Then she proceeds to run probably close to twice as fast as me. She was flying. Next year I'm going to be racing against a bunch of people like that and better. I have a LOT of work to do.
cheeba wrote:Personal best! 33:37 for 3.3 miles, which is 37 seconds better than previous best.
cheeba wrote:Of course while I feel good about my speed increasing, I also got a nice reality check on the run. I hear the pitter patter of feet behind me and I know someone's catching up to me. This chick runs by and we say hi, I tell her she's shaming me and she laughs and says at least I'm moving. Then she proceeds to run probably close to twice as fast as me. She was flying. Next year I'm going to be racing against a bunch of people like that and better. I have a LOT of work to do.
The Hogenator wrote:
No matter how fast you get, there are always people who are faster. There are people who see YOU as the fast one!

cheeba wrote:Of course while I feel good about my speed increasing, I also got a nice reality check on the run. I hear the pitter patter of feet behind me and I know someone's catching up to me. This chick runs by and we say hi, I tell her she's shaming me and she laughs and says at least I'm moving. Then she proceeds to run probably close to twice as fast as me. She was flying. Next year I'm going to be racing against a bunch of people like that and better. I have a LOT of work to do.
Chaz wrote:Just got back from my "how far can I go?" run. Turns out it's at least 8.1 miles at a pretty consistent 9:30 pace.![]()
Chaz wrote:Now go check out Kurth's numbers that he posted just after mine. That guy's nuts.
Fretmute wrote:I started the couch to 5k this weekend. First jog Sunday evening went pretty well, although here I am two days later, and my quads still hurt.
Damn you, aging!
I'm also doing the 100 pushups program, but I seriously doubt that I will ever be able to do that many in a row. I'm not Herschel Walker.
Zaxxon wrote:If by track your progress you mean track your workouts, try CardioTrainer. It's great both for GPS workouts and manual entry after the fact.
Tempo Run wrote:Tempo Runs: This is a continuous run with an easy beginning, a buildup in the middle to near 10-K race pace, then ease back and cruise to the finish. A typical tempo run would begin with 5-10 minutes easy running, continue with 10-15 faster running, and finish with 5-10 minutes cooling down. You can't figure out your pace on a watch doing this workout; you need to listen to your body. Tempo runs are very useful for developing anaerobic threshold, essential for fast 5-K racing.
Kurth wrote:My personal take-away: It's all about individual goals. Unless you're one in a million, you're never going to be the fastest person out there!
Chaz wrote:I started with CardioTrainer when I started out with Ct5k, but switched to Runkeeper pretty fast. CardioTrainer doesn't (as far as I know) let you set up intervals with alerts, and doesn't track data on a website.
GreenGoo wrote:To me, if the "faster" part in the middle is approaching the 10k race pace, then it is still slower than a "normal" 5k pace. Is a tempo run mostly a rest run? Slow and easy, faster but not too fast, then back to slow and easy?
Zaxxon wrote:Chaz wrote:I started with CardioTrainer when I started out with Ct5k, but switched to Runkeeper pretty fast. CardioTrainer doesn't (as far as I know) let you set up intervals with alerts, and doesn't track data on a website.
Yes, it does (with the Pro module) include intervals, and yes they have a site. I don't think the site is as full-featured as RK's, though. Does RK let you track non-run workouts these days? I also enjoy CT's 'race against yourself' feature that lets you re-run a route with real-time updates as to how you compare to a previous run on that route. Not sure if RK includes that.
Zaxxon wrote:
10k race pace is faster than a 5k training pace. A tempo run is anaerobic at its peak and aerobic during the slower parts. It's definitely not a rest run. You start out slow but by the 10k race pace section you should be feeling it in a pretty serious way. The way I think of it is a run where the slow warmup just keeps on getting faster until it hurts, and then the cooldown is longer than normal but also much more gradual. Make sense?
It might clarify things to consider that when Higdon says '10k race pace', he's referring to the 10k race pace of someone who is quite fit (eg a marathoner). It's fast--10ks are a challenge for them due to their speed, not their distance.
GreenGoo wrote:Opinions? My thoughts were to post the training program, where I am on it, what I've completed, where I have to go next, my performance during the training and anything of note that comes up, like injuries, plateaus, overcoming humps, and so forth.
On the negative side the constant pace changes, including paces faster than my comfort level, will drain me more than the same distance at a steady pace.
stessier wrote:I've always thought of a tempo run as both fun and mentally taxing. Fun because going fast is always fun. But mentally trying because going fast and long is hard and when things get hard, my mind always starts looking for a way out. I've had great success with the moving stop line (Ie, I'll keep going to that light pole, then let myself stop - but then I get there and make the same deal for the next one). I'm sure everyone has some trick.
Return to Everything But Gaming
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Holman, RiniaSom32 and 3 guests