triggercut wrote:Admission of error isn't in his toolset, and so he's led himself to be thoroughly outed as a badguy here.
Admission of error is most definitely in my toolset. However, I only use that tool when I've erred.
The exact statistical cost of killing Superman today is 2%, all else held constant and all human intelligence factored out. That's 2% well spent, because human intelligence is never factored out. Among other things, it liberates WW from having to play guardian over him, and it gives us another WW scan, another MM contact, and all the accumulated lore of today to work with. (The night death we'd suffer anyhow)
Repeat: the exact cost of spending Superman right now is 2%; the benefits far outweigh that 1/50, which is nearly invisible in the grand scheme of things.
5. Suggesting that we have Superman out himself and then vote for him doesn't help the village. That particular vote is screwed and offers no useful information because the motive is unclear on such a vote. It ends up being like forming a strategy for No Limit Hold 'em while playing for buttons, and then going to the casino and getting into a thousand dollar game. The stakes make the motive and strategies, and the motive and strategies is what we're working to uncover with each analysis.
6. In order to succeed here, then, we need votes on unknown players to go to critical or even lynch levels. Those are the events that give the goodguys info to crunch and numbers to play with.
7. The downside to the strategy is *usually* that it could end up forcing a special to uncloak. In this game and at this point, I'm not sure it hurts us as much as in other games.
Suppose it's Batman or WW....
I can see you're locked down in a battle of wills on this; no line of reasoning will move you.
The difference between using Superman today and wasting him on someday is real, but it probably won't swing the game. So suppose that Remus is off the table (since not even Sean, who outed him, wants him to be anything more than a placeholder). In that instance (and bracketing out your irrational, reactionary angle on me), whom do you suspect?
Know what I'd be doing right now, if I were evil? Sitting back and watching, and that's all. Those who have been co-evil with me know how often I counsel patience and quiet. Most of the evidence from this day will turn out to be wrinkles such as this one: who among those customarily engaged in deliberations is now just sitting back and watching the mutual undermining and autovitiation of the Justice League?
8. Positing that we forego all that and put off gleaning of valuable analysis until the team has possibly been whittled to 12 members seems to be a not very good idea for the goodguys, and seems in fact like the kind of nefarious plan that the badguys would try to "plant".
Again, the statistical difference is only 2%; the real debate has to do with whether you think the intel we'd gather by a likely teamkill (with possibly more Special-outings as we target friends instead of foes) is really that much more valuable than the intel we're already gathering and would gather while keeping all our lives and the rest of our secrets intact today.